8 “Opposition” in Academia and Science

Voices against Jade Helm ‘15

Transhumanists see nature as an obstacle that man must overcome. We could say that Transhumanism embraces the “physical realm,” while those who think along my lines, and those of most readers, embrace the “spiritual realm.” According to Transhumanism, nature has flaws, but most important; nature is slow to evolve and is the world where everything inevitably dies, contrary to Transhumanism, which is the world of eternal life, where everything always lives. Does Transhumanism remind you of Satanism, but also perhaps of alchemy?

Death must be overcome: death is scary, death is a mystery, and death is loss of information. The followers of the Transhumanist movement do not understand that knowledge is automatically stored in the mass consciousness and the so-called Akashic Records. The Overlords know this, of course, but they need to keep letting death be a mystery to people: something to fear. Transhumanism is based on fear of death, and this fear button is what they push to recruit their followers. Thus, the Controllers will never tell the masses about the afterlife. We are given hints about it, but by the same token, we are also given hints that there is no afterlife. The Controllers need to keep the yin and yang concept going in order to divide and conquer.

Apparently, there are certain people in academia and in science, who have begun to oppose the AI agenda. They can see the ultimate danger with Transhumanism and AI. About the time the infamous Jade Helm 15 happened (more about that later), thousands of scientists protested against Transhumanism and Artificial Intelligence. Two of the most famous scientists were Stephen Hawking and Noam Chomsky. “They signed an open letter, calling for a ban on killer robots.” (Independent, July 27, 2015). The scientist, who protested, were of the opinion that if we let the AI movement continue the way it was, the robots will eventually take over and eradicate mankind. They said it’s more or less inevitable because of the superior intelligence robots will have; robots will consider humans obsolete and terminate us. These scientists appeared extremely worried.

Some might say that these scientists are only playing a part of the AI game to present the opposite side of the Movement to again keep yin and yang in balance. This, I believe, is probably true to a large extent. Perhaps, Hawking is on the right track, now partly realizing what is actually going on behind the scenes, or he is just playing his role in the agenda.

Professor Hawking, and a number of other protesting scientists and academia, have been part of creating this future nightmare, and at one point, perhaps, they realized that what they have been involved in is destructive. They became concerned that, if not stopped, the AI movement might lead to the end of humankind. They might have believed that they needed to make up for the damage they unwittingly had done; hence, they started protesting against the Movement. Or again, it’s all just make-believe.

Stephen Hawking sits on the Board of Directors of the Future of Life Institute; a group consisting of some of the greatest minds of our time whose aim is to mitigate “existential risks facing humanity.” They now warn us of the danger of starting a “military AI arms race.” Other members of the Board are Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak, Apple’s co-founder.

There was recently a TV series called The Colony, which is about a totalitarian society, where humans are fenced into “colonies” with huge brick walls surrounding each colony. A malevolent alien race had fairly recently landed and segregated humans by creating these colonies, and depending on where you were located at the moment the aliens took over, that’s where you got stuck from thereon. This meant that you could get separated from friends and family, who might have been designated to live in another colony, without any communication between the colonies. No one was allowed outside the Walls (fences), or they would be killed or sent to some mysterious place called The Factory. The aliens kept themselves hidden, but were in contact with some key members of mankind, and the aliens had man surveil man in a super-strict military fashion. In fact, they were using drones that flew around everywhere in order to surveil people; they kept close track of everybody and killed them with a deadly beams of light weapon when programmed to do so.

The Colony was very popular, and new episodes are being made as I’m writing this. This series tells us things about our future that the Elite want us to know; the drones are one part of it. With these drones in mind, the media outlet The Independent writes the following in regards to the protesting scientists and their concerns:

These robotic weapons may include armed drones that can search for and kill certain people based on their programming, the next step from the current generation of drones, which are flown by humans who are often thousands of miles away from the warzone.

The letter says: "AI technology has reached a point where the deployment of such systems is - practically if not legally - feasible within years, not decades."

It adds that autonomous weapons "have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and nuclear arms".

It says that the Institute sees the "great potential [of AI] to benefit humanity in many ways", but believes the development of robotic weapons, which it said would prove useful to terrorists, brutal dictators, and those wishing to perpetrate ethnic cleansing, is not.

Such weapons do not yet truly exist, but the technology that would allow them to be used is not far away. Opponents, like the signatories to the letter, believe that by eliminating the risk of human deaths, robotic weapons (the technology for which will become cheap and ubiquitous in coming years), would lower the threshold for going to war--potentially making wars more common. [Ibid. op. cit.]

I believe this to be true, but AI is not only a danger when it comes to warfare; it’s a danger to humankind. Barbara Marciniak’s Pleiadians say that we are at the brink of extinction as a human race at this immediate point, and a new cycle will begin, in which a new type of human will emerge from the extinct Homo sapiens sapiens, and this new human will be AI [Sources: an array of Pleiadian lectures, spanning from 2014-2016.] They say that we, who have the knowledge, need to create new timelines, where we don’t need to participate in this insanity, and that’s our only way out. If we don’t, we too will be sucked into this because it’s so easily done and very cleverly set up.

In 2015, the UK opposed a ban on killer robots at a UN conference, claiming that it sees no need for such a prohibition, because the UK is not producing such weapons. [Independent, April 14, 2015, “UK government backs international development of 'killer robots' at UN”]

This immediately contradicts what is actually going on in the UK. The UN conference was in 2015, but already in 2014, there were reports about drones filling the British skies in another Independent article (my emphasis),

The number of drones operating in British airspace has soared, with defence contractors, surveillance specialists, police forces and infrastructure firms among more than 300 companies and public bodies with permission to operate the controversial unmanned aircraft.


Other organisations able to operate drones in UK airspace include the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, a research arm of the Ministry of Defence, and Marlborough Communications, which supplies UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] and other equipment to the British military. The Home Office and Defra have used drones, as have 11 other state bodies. [Independent, Sep. 20, 2014, “Drones are filling Britain's skies: Look up now to see what is looking back down at you”]

One of the biggest lies, as I see it, is that because this is a “genetic library,” anything goes. Beings from other worlds or dimensions have the right to come here and experiment, and we are told that there is nothing that we can do about it— according to the Pleiadians. Which begs the question, do we even have the right to intervene in our own future?

This idea is shoveled into our consciousness by beings with ulterior motives. It is true that Earth is a Living Library, but this Living Library was nearly completed, perhaps billions of years ago, when the Queen of the Stars and Her Helpers set up their Experiment here. This didn’t mean that the genetic library couldn’t be adjusted, if needed; however, that was only allowed to be done by the Ancient Races—the Orion Queen and Her genetic engineers. Never was there an intention to let a band of outlaws come to Earth, kill and chase away the Original Creators, and take over the Library as they pleased, only to transform an already evolved race into slave labor. Never was it intended for these imposters to create an entirely new species that was inferior to the existing one, for the creators own selfish purposes, thus nullifying the entire purpose of the original Living Library. Moreover, it was never intended that this conquering gang of criminal star races should set up a frequency band, or quarantine, around Earth and our solar system, in order to decide who were allowed here and who were not.

Steven Hawking has said,

"Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks."[wiki/AI takeover#Warnings]

As one who has contributed to AI and the Singularity, is he now getting cold feet, but still wants to hang on to the idea that AI can be beneficial, if handled with care? Hawking may be a genius, but he’s still a scientist at heart. Also, if someone, who does not have a criminal mind, realizes that they have participated in something that is very destructive, in order to make themselves feel better, they need to justify his or her wrongdoings, unless the person wants to take full responsibility. Responsibility is sometimes very difficult because we need to ransack ourselves, but it’s nonetheless necessary for all of us. Hopefully, Hawking is on his way, but I’m not so sure (we will scrutinize Hawking more in the last section of this chapter). Understanding human behavior means that we can have more compassion for those who try to become better and less naïve.

Next page:

© 2016 Wes Penre (main website)